User Tools

Site Tools


cosmic:dm_particle

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
cosmic:dm_particle [2020/12/02 13:10] hughlippincottcosmic:dm_particle [2020/12/11 11:22] (current) – [Big Questions White Papers] tongylin
Line 5: Line 5:
     * For instructions how to join an Email list refer to [[https://snowmass21.org/cosmic/start#communications| Cosmic Frontier/Communications]]     * For instructions how to join an Email list refer to [[https://snowmass21.org/cosmic/start#communications| Cosmic Frontier/Communications]]
   * Slack channel: [[https://app.slack.com/client/TNNU4A570/C012JM41VQC/details/info| cf01-dark_matter_particle]]   * Slack channel: [[https://app.slack.com/client/TNNU4A570/C012JM41VQC/details/info| cf01-dark_matter_particle]]
-  * Indico page with summer/fall meeting schedule: [[https://indico.fnal.gov/category/1193/link]]+  * Indico page for all CF1 meetings, with notes and recordings available for each past meeting: [[https://indico.fnal.gov/category/1193/https://indico.fnal.gov/category/1193]]
  
 ====== Description ====== ====== Description ======
Line 21: Line 21:
  
    * Direct detection to the neutrino floor (theory motivation including EFT)    * Direct detection to the neutrino floor (theory motivation including EFT)
-         * Coordinators: Rick Gaitskell, Cristiano Galbiati, Ben Loer+         * Coordinators: Prisca Cushman, Rick Gaitskell, Cristiano Galbiati, Ben Loer
          * Slack: #cf01-wp1-direct-detection-neutrino-floor          * Slack: #cf01-wp1-direct-detection-neutrino-floor
-         * multi-scale portfolio that includes a broad energy range and experiment cost.  (Xe, Ar, CCDs, Bubble chamber, Solid State Detectors)   +
-         * focus on ~>1 GeV nuclear recoils +
-         * reasonable to achieve on a G3 timescale (~10 yr including construction and operations).+
    * The landscape of low threshold detection in the next decade (theory motivation included by theory of detectors including AMO, bandgaps,etc more in #4)    * The landscape of low threshold detection in the next decade (theory motivation included by theory of detectors including AMO, bandgaps,etc more in #4)
          * Coordinators: Graham Giovanetti, Noah Kurinsky, Daniel McKinsey, Tien-Tien Yu           * Coordinators: Graham Giovanetti, Noah Kurinsky, Daniel McKinsey, Tien-Tien Yu 
          * Slack: #cf01-wp2-low-threshold-detection          * Slack: #cf01-wp2-low-threshold-detection
-         * Re-statement of parts of BRN/Cosmic Visions for low threshold detectors +
-         * Theory to motivate then a description of the new wave of experimental ideas. +
-         * How to handle experiments at different phases (e.g. SENSEI/DAMIC and CDMS vs. LHe vs. other novel ideas that are even more in R&D stage)?+
    * Calibration/backgrounds for direct detection - focus on cross-experiment cooperation (e.g. materials screening)    * Calibration/backgrounds for direct detection - focus on cross-experiment cooperation (e.g. materials screening)
          * Coordinators: Dan Baxter, Raymond Bunker, Sally Shaw, Shawn Westerdale          * Coordinators: Dan Baxter, Raymond Bunker, Sally Shaw, Shawn Westerdale
          * Slack: #cf01-wp3-calibration-backgrounds-direct          * Slack: #cf01-wp3-calibration-backgrounds-direct
-         * What improvements do we need to make in understanding detector calibration and backgrounds to support/enable the direct detection program over the next decade? +
-         * Discuss common needs/issues across experiments +
-         * Endorsement of low energy NR sources wherever they are +
-         * Discussion of noise sources (electron emission, IR backgrounds, etc).+
    * Computing/simulation/modeling/statistics needs for direct detection - we’re sort of thinking of simulation/modeling of new materials - like NEST but for new stuff (theory needed for particle interactions in materials as opposed to particle theory models)    * Computing/simulation/modeling/statistics needs for direct detection - we’re sort of thinking of simulation/modeling of new materials - like NEST but for new stuff (theory needed for particle interactions in materials as opposed to particle theory models)
          * Coordinators: Yoni Kahn, Maria Elena Monzani, Kim Palladino          * Coordinators: Yoni Kahn, Maria Elena Monzani, Kim Palladino
          * Slack: #cf01-wp4-comp-model-stats-direct          * Slack: #cf01-wp4-comp-model-stats-direct
-          What theoretical developments do we need to support/enable the direct detection program over the next decade? + 
-          Could cover effective theory techniquescommon statistical frameworksbetter simulations, new theory for primary and secondary interactions & collective excitationsetc. +   The landscape of cosmic-ray and high-energy photon probes of particle dark matter 
-          Support theory and interdisciplinary research (materials theorycondensed matterAMO)+         Coordinators: Regina CaputoStefano ProfumoPhilip von Doetinchem 
 +         * Slack: #cf01-wp5-cosmic-ray-and-photon-probes 
 + 
 +   * Puzzling excesses and how we can resolve their origin/existence 
 +         * Coordinators: Liang Yang, Rebecca LeaneSam McDermott 
 +         Slack: #cf01-wp6-puzzling-excesses 
 + 
 +   * Synergies between DM searches and multiwavelength/multimessenger astrophysics / understanding astrophysical backgrounds 
 +         * Coordinators: Shunsaki HoriuchiKerstin PerezDevin Walker 
 +         * Slack: #cf01-wp7-dm-synergies-with-multiwavelength-astro 
 + 
 +   * Ultraheavy particle dark matter / probing the heaviest particle dark matter candidates (envisaged to be a shorter paper than some others) 
 +         * Coordinators: Andrea Albert, Dan Carney 
 +         * #cf01-wp8-ultraheavy-particle-dm 
  
  
cosmic/dm_particle.1606936259.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/12/02 13:10 by hughlippincott

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki